
Gelato 33 (Cannabis flos Cantourage): lineage from Sunset Sherbet and profile from a single source
Hybrid from Sunset Sherbet and Thin Mint GSC, available in Polish pharmacies from one producer. The profile composition is described by only one database, and studies that can be honestly referenced here concern limonene administered to animals.
| Strain card | Gelato 33 |
|---|---|
| Producers | Cantourage (1 pharmacy position) |
| Medical brand | the same as the producer |
| Alternative names | none |
| Category by sources | hybrid |
| Leading terpene | limonene |
| Other terpenes | farnesene linalool myrcene |
| Lineage | established Sunset Sherbet × Thin Mint Gsc |
| Source consistency | single source |
- Who supplies it. Exclusively Cantourage, so there is nothing to compare versions with, and a supply break means no availability of this strain, not another version of it.
- Profile. Limonene leads, alongside farnesene, linalool, myrcene. We do not provide percentage shares, as sources calculate them against different totals.
- Origin. Established lineage, parents are Sunset Sherbet and Thin Mint Gsc.
- What is missing. The profile describes a single source, so there is nothing to compare it with.
Where does Gelato 33 come from and who developed it?
From the cookies line: the parents of Gelato 33 are Sunset Sherbet and Thin Mint GSC, and the authorship of the cross is attributed to the California group Cookie Fam Genetics. Both databases describing this position in the Polish market consistently call it a hybrid, so there is no discrepancy regarding the type of plant between sources.
The number in the strain name is a breeder’s selection label and does not describe the content of any ingredient. Separating these two things makes sense right away, as the registration name of the raw material also has a number, but there next to the THC abbreviation and means something completely different.
Two Polish databases record this position differently: one as Gelato 33, the other as Gelato #33. It is the same raw material from the same producer, and the difference comes down to the hash before the number. By the mere recording of the name, one cannot tell that it refers to the same thing, and when browsing several lists at once, it can be confusing.
We have the lineage here from two independent descriptions of genetics, which is not a rule in this comparison. Sixty cultivars out of eighty-five have established origins, and for the remaining ones, the trail ends: either the breeder of the parents never provided it, or the descriptions contradict each other. Then there is the temptation to guess by name, and the common element proves nothing in either direction.
Which producer supplies Gelato 33 to Polish pharmacies?
One. The position comes from Cantourage, and in the collected list, it corresponds exactly to one catalog number, so there are no two versions of the same strain to compare. The registration name is Cannabis flos Cantourage, and the numerical part, which usually stands further in it, is provided below separately as a range.
| What the list states | Value for this position |
|---|---|
| Producer | Cantourage |
| Registration name | Cannabis flos Cantourage |
| Raw material form | hemp flower, inflorescence |
| Declared THC content | 23.4-28.6% (range resulting from producer tolerance) |
| CBD content | stated as not exceeding one percent |
| Genetics according to both databases | hybrid |
| Number of positions in the pharmacy list | one |
One producer means one supply chain. When a batch runs out or the marketing authorization expires, there is no substitute under the same name, and the decision for another raw material returns to the attending physician. Therefore, what is actually in the wholesaler for a given month is tracked in a separate place: in the overview of strains that can be purchased today at the pharmacy.
The active substance content is recorded as a range because the producer’s declaration is not a measurement of the batch that made it to the shelf. The deviation from the declared value reaches one-tenth in either direction, so the number entered in the registration name is the midpoint of the range, not a reading from analysis. Stated alone promises accuracy to which no one has committed here.
Pharmaceutical raw material should not be confused with hemp flower sold without a prescription, as it is a separate product category and a separate dispensing procedure. A table with one row looks poor, and that is exactly how the truth about this strain in Poland looks: there is no second producer alongside which the registration record or declared potency could be compared.
What does Gelato 33 smell like and what does its profile say about it?
- farnesene farnesene
- limonene limonene (leading in the pharmacy list)
- linalool linalool
- myrcene myrcene
Sweet and fruity, with a hint of lavender and an earthy background. This is how it is described by the catalog from which the only available description of the composition of this strain comes. It is a sensory report, not a measurement: the same flower described by two people receives two different sets of adjectives, and neither is wrong.
The catalog lists in the profile of this strain farnesene, limonene, linalool, and myrcene. However, only one source describes it this way: the second of the collected databases records the same position from the same producer, but does not provide the order of ingredients at all, so there is nothing to compare it with.
This one database distributes shares evenly across all four positions, which means that none of them is indicated as leading. The limonene strain label comes from the pharmacy list, not from this breakdown, and is a different kind of data than the result of chromatographic separation.
We do not transcribe the shares here in numbers, and this is not an over-caution. The summed shares that Polish compilations provide for the same positions sometimes do not even reach half, and sometimes hit four-fifths, so the denominator is different every time and remains unknown. A number without a denominator in a text about prescription raw material looks like a measurement, but it is not a measurement.
The aroma can be different at the beginning and end of the package. Volatile components evaporate faster than cannabinoids, so by the end of the supply, it smells weaker than on the day it was opened. The description from the catalog refers to fresh material, and this reservation is usually not made with it.
How long does it take for Gelato 33 to take effect and how long does it last?
This is determined by the method of intake, not the label on the package. For Gelato 33 itself, no one has measured the duration over time, so the only thing that can be honestly provided here are the common frames for inhaled vapor and for ingested raw material, common for all cultivars without exception.
The route of administration determines the course more than the strain itself, and the ranges below describe it, not this cultivar, as pharmacokinetic studies for a single cultivar have not been published.
| Vaporization | After ingestion | |
|---|---|---|
| First sensations | after a few minutes | from half an hour to two |
| Onset | another ten to thirty minutes | slow, over several hours |
| Total duration | within two to four hours | after six, sometimes eight hours |
| Typical error | none | taking a dose after thirty minutes, which gives both doses at once |
The difference between strains lies in the portion, not the clock. The declared THC range for this position, 23.4-28.6%, indicates how much raw material corresponds to the same amount of active substance, not when the first sensation will appear. The method of administration and portion size is determined by the attending physician, as the flower is dispensed by prescription.
What has been shown in studies, and what has not been shown for this strain?
Nothing has been shown about Gelato 33 itself. The studies that can be honestly referenced here concern a single component of the profile, limonene, administered to animals in isolation and in doses calculated per body weight. This is a different object than the flower inhaled by humans, and this difference cannot be bridged.
| Study | Model and route of administration | What was shown |
|---|---|---|
| do Vale TG et al., 2002 Phytomedicine PMID:12587690 |
rodent (mouse, intraperitoneal administration) | Limonene administered intraperitoneally in mice showed muscle relaxant effects (rota-rod test) from a dose of 50 mg/kg and prolonged sleep time induced by pentobarbital at a dose of 200 mg/kg (about 2.6 times); in the elevated plus maze test, already at a dose of 5 mg/kg, it reduced the number of entries into the open arms, which the authors described as an anxiogenic effect, not anxiolytic. |
| Fakhri S et al., 2025 Behavioural Pharmacology PMID:40622197 |
rodent (rat and mouse) | Limonene reduced paw swelling induced by carrageenan in rats and pain responses in the formalin test in mice; the effect was associated with the l-arginine/nitric oxide/cGMP/KATP channel pathway and involvement of opioid and benzodiazepine receptors. |
No anxiolytic effect of limonene has been shown in humans. It has also not been shown that isolated limonene acts anxiolytically in animals; the only available data from the elevated plus maze test showed in mice the opposite effect, reducing the number of entries into the open arms even at a low dose.
The rest of what circulates about this strain has a different status. The catalog assigns it a balanced effect, but this is a commercial description, not a research result, and there is no measurement behind it made public. Patient reports are collected without a control group and without blinding, so they speak about expectations as much as about the raw material.
What side effects have been reported for this strain?
None that could be attributed to this specific name. In Polish compilations, there is no layer that could separate reports by cultivar, and Gelato 33 stands in the list as one position from one producer, so even a single report would disappear in the aggregate pool.
Reports of side effects are collected for a medicinal product with a batch number, not for the strain name, so the following concerns hemp flower as a group of raw materials. The most commonly reported are dry mouth, red eyes, and increased heart rate. Less frequently described are dizziness upon rapid standing, daytime drowsiness, and temporary worsening of short-term memory, as well as anxiety increasing with dosage. A separate issue is medications taken concurrently, especially sedatives and those affecting coagulation: their assessment requires knowledge of the entire list of preparations, not just the description of the plant. We do not provide the frequency of these symptoms numerically, as public compilations for hemp flower in Poland do not separate them by individual products.
One thing ties this list to this position. The declared THC range here is 23.4-28.6%, and among the 66 strains in this compilation for which the source provides a range, only nine reach the upper limit. The aforementioned anxiety increases with dosage, so with stronger raw material, the same amount of material carries more active substance. The portion size is determined by the attending physician, and this is information about the raw material, not a dosing guideline.
Is there a single vaporization temperature for this strain?
No. The four components listed in its profile boil at different temperatures, and the spread reaches several dozen degrees; for one of them, the public database does not provide a boiling point at all. Therefore, a single number would have to omit one of them, and it still would not describe what happens in the chamber.
The public database PubChem provides pressure along with the boiling point for three of these four positions: myrcene boils at about 167 degrees Celsius, limonene at 178, linalool at 196, all at atmospheric pressure. For farnesene, there is no boiling point in this database, so it is not suitable for comparison with the previous ones.
Setting on the vaporizer is not the temperature of the flower, and this is a separate topic that we address in the text about the difference between setting and material. The heating element or airflow has its temperature, and the material in the chamber has its own, lower and uneven, because the flow cools it during inhalation. This difference exists and has not been publicly measured.
The boiling point itself is often read as the threshold for the onset of vaporization, but it is not: volatile components evaporate much lower, just slower. For this reason, we do not provide any range as recommended. The method of administering raw material dispensed by prescription is determined by the attending physician, and what is separately known about limonene itself is described in its dedicated entry.
Which strains from Polish pharmacies are related to it?
| Strain | Common parent | Leading terpene | Producers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sherbert Scotti | Sunset Sherbet | caryophyllene | S-LAB |
One: Sherbert Scotti. Both derive from Sunset Sherbet, but the second parent of Gelato 33 is Thin Mint GSC, while Sherbert Scotti has Biscotti on the other side. This kinship is counted by one common parent, not by a similarly sounding name or by a common element in the record.
The pedigree chart in this comparison includes only cultivars present in Polish pharmacies, so siblings outside this collection do not appear in it at all. A short list does not mean that the strain is genealogically alone; it means that the rest of the family does not have a catalog number here.
Sherbert Scotti is supplied by a different producer, and less is known about it: none of the two collected sources describes its terpene profile, so next to Gelato 33 stands an empty column in the table. Two related positions in the same list may therefore have completely different documentation status, and the distance in the pedigree does not determine anything about that.
Empty columns for siblings with other strains in this comparison can be a correct result, not a gap to be filled. A parent being a landrace or a broad family style does not define siblings, as that is a category, not a single plant with an established identity. Here, both parents are named cultivars, so the connection can be traced without guessing.
Frequently asked questions about Gelato 33
Is Gelato 33 available without a prescription?
No. Hemp flower is a pharmaceutical raw material dispensed by a physician’s prescription in the Rpw category, and Gelato 33 is listed as a pharmacy position from one producer.
Who developed Gelato 33?
The cross of Sunset Sherbet with Thin Mint GSC is attributed to the California group Cookie Fam Genetics, and both collected databases consistently describe this strain as a hybrid.
How much THC does Gelato 33 have?
The source provides a declared value, which, taking into account the producer’s tolerance, we record as a range of 23.4-28.6%; a single number from the label would promise accuracy to which no one has committed.
Does Gelato 33 have anxiolytic effects?
This has not been shown. Available studies concern limonene administered to animals in isolation, and the only anxiety test in this set yielded an opposite result in mice.
How do we know what terpenes Gelato 33 has?
From one catalog that lists in its profile farnesene, limonene, linalool, and myrcene; the second of the collected databases records the same position but does not provide the composition.
Why does the availability of this strain change over time?
Because it is backed by one producer and one catalog number: a supply break or expiration of the authorization removes it from the list without a substitute under the same name.
The material is for informational purposes and does not replace medical advice or pharmaceutical consultation. Editorial text: editorial team ubucha.pl.







