
Mystic Wonder (Cannabis flos Suprobion): lineage, myrcene and two conflicting descriptions
Mystic Wonder reaches Polish pharmacies from one producer, and two bases describing the same position provide different sets of terpenes. We gather what can be confirmed: lineage, content range, and the limits of research on myrcene.
| Strain card | Mystic Wonder |
|---|---|
| Producers | Suprobion (1 pharmacy position) |
| Medical brand | the same as the producer |
| Alternative names | none |
| Category according to sources | hybrid / indica-dominant hybrid (conflicting sources) |
| Leading terpene | myrcene |
| Other terpenes | farnesene caryophyllene limonene pinene |
| Lineage | established Garlic Sherbert × Cactus Breath |
| Source consistency | divergent (2 sources) |
- Who supplies it. Only Suprobion, so there is nothing to compare versions with, and a supply break means the absence of this strain, not another version of it.
- Profile. Myrcene leads, alongside farnesene, caryophyllene, limonene, pinene. We do not provide percentage shares because sources count them against different totals.
- Origin. Established lineage, parents are Garlic Sherbert and Cactus Breath.
- What is missing. Two sources describe the profile differently, so the further part of the set is disputed, not established.
Where does Mystic Wonder come from and who established its lineage?
Mystic Wonder was created by crossing Garlic Sherbert with Cactus Breath, and the same parent pair is provided by two independent industry descriptions. It reaches Polish pharmacies as a flower under the registered name Cannabis flos Suprobion. The parent strains do not have their own positions in Polish trade, so the kinship cannot be traced on the pharmacy shelf.
The established lineage is not a rule in this set: out of twenty-five cultivars from eighty-five, the breeder of the parents did not disclose or available descriptions contradict each other. Here both sources indicate the same, so the record goes into the text without reservations. A reservation appears regarding classification: BudCare describes the position as a hybrid with indica dominance, Medweed as a hybrid without a note, and it concerns the same registered name and the same producer.
Garlic Sherbert and Cactus Breath are breeding strains known from seed catalogs, not pharmaceutical raw materials, so their own profiles do not have the status of data confirmed by research. The recorded lineage says that such genealogy was provided by the breeder or distributor. It does not indicate the terpene composition of the offspring or the course of action, because between the seed and the pharmacy bag lies the entire cultivation, harvest, drying, and quality control. We maintain a current overview of positions available in Polish pharmacies in the list of available strains.
How many producers supply this strain to Polish pharmacies?
One. Mystic Wonder comes exclusively from Suprobion and in the assortment list corresponds to a single position, so there are no parallel pharmacy versions to compare. The table below collects what can be said about this one position without resorting to numbers that change between deliveries.
| Producer | Registered name | THC content | Genetics in descriptions | Availability noted by BudCare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suprobion | Cannabis flos Suprobion | 20.7-25.3% | hybrid or hybrid with indica dominance, depending on the base | high |
The content given as a range comes from one declaration by the producer increased by an allowable deviation: the value on the label may fall higher or lower by a tenth of itself. A bare number would sound like a measurement made on that specific bag, and such a measurement is not given to the patient. The registered name carries this number in the middle, but we transcribe it without that element so that false precision does not return through the back door.
One producer also means that the presence of the strain in circulation hangs on one supply chain. The permit for the admission of the raw material has an expiration date, the wholesaler may have supply breaks, the pharmacy orders what is currently available, so the position can disappear for several weeks and return without notice. We therefore maintain the shelf state in one place, in the current list, and not in the strain description. Cannabis flower is a pharmaceutical raw material dispensed by a doctor’s prescription in the Rpw category, and a separate shelf, which this mode does not apply to, is retail hemp flower.
What does this flower smell like and which terpenes are responsible for it?
- farnesene farnesene
- caryophyllene caryophyllene
- limonene limonene
- myrcene myrcene (leading in the pharmacy list)
- pinene pinene
Descriptions converge on four notes: citrus, woody, fruity, and earthy. The difficulty begins with assigning them to the composition, as two bases describing the same position differ in their list of terpenes, and none provides a denominator against which the shares of individual compounds in the total sample would be counted.
Medweed lists three components and orders them by weight: myrcene at the top, followed by limonene, then caryophyllene. BudCare lists five names, adding farnesene and pinene to those. The discrepancy does not prove that one base is wrong. The designations come from different batches of raw material and from different laboratories, and published lists are sometimes shortened to the most prominent positions, so two descriptions of the same name can look like two different raw materials. The aroma description also comes from the taxonomy of the base, not from a sensory panel assessment: adjectives were chosen from a closed list, so two raw materials described with the same set do not have to smell the same.
For the nose, this discrepancy is perceptible. Pinene pulls the scent towards needles, farnesene towards green apple, and myrcene leaves an impression of damp earth with a herbal background. If a specific batch lacks any of these compounds, the aroma will turn out differently than in the description of the base that mentioned it. We write separately about myrcene and pinene, we do the same for limonene, caryophyllene, and farnesene.
How long does it take to take effect and how long does it last?
After vaporization, effects begin within a few minutes and fade within a few hours, after ingestion the onset shifts by half an hour to two, and the total duration stretches over half a day. The method of administration determines the course more than the strain name, so the same ranges apply to any other position from the pharmacy.
The route of administration determines the course more than the strain itself, and the ranges below describe it, not this cultivar, because pharmacokinetic studies for a single cultivar have not been published.
| Vaporization | After ingestion | |
|---|---|---|
| First sensations | within a few minutes | from half an hour to two |
| Onset | another ten to thirty minutes | slow, over several hours |
| Total fades | within two to four hours | after six, sometimes eight hours |
| Typical mistake | none | taking a dose after thirty minutes, which gives both doses at once |
Additionally, there is a variable that no table covers, which is the equipment. The temperature set on the vaporizer does not equal the temperature of the flower in the chamber, so two people at the same setting inhale vapor of a different composition and then describe a different course.
What has been shown in studies, and what is the producer’s declaration?
Nothing that directly concerns Mystic Wonder. Publications describe individual terpenes administered to animals under laboratory conditions, not the flower sold under this name. The bases attribute its relaxing and balanced effects, but this is commercial description language, not a result of measurements made on this strain.
The evidence that exists concerns myrcene.
| Study | Model and route of administration | What was shown |
|---|---|---|
| Rao VS et al., 1990 Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology PMID:1983154 |
rodent (mouse) | Myrcene (10-40 mg/kg) reduced pain responses in mice in hot plate and writhing tests induced by acetic acid; the effect was reversed by naloxone and yohimbine, indicating involvement of alpha2-adrenergic receptors and release of endogenous opioids. |
| do Vale TG et al., 2002 Phytomedicine PMID:12587690 |
rodent (mouse, intraperitoneal administration) | Myrcene administered intraperitoneally (100-200 mg/kg) reduced locomotor activity in mice in an open field test, prolonged sleep time induced by pentobarbital (at 200 mg/kg about 2.6 times), and reduced the number of entries into the open arms of the elevated plus maze, which the authors described as a weak anxiogenic effect, not anxiolytic. |
| Wagner JK et al., 2024 NeuroSci PMID:39728677 |
rodent (mouse, inhaled vapors) | With short puffs mimicking inhalation in humans, beta-myrcene acted anxiolytically in the elevated plus maze in female mice, and in males only with a single puff. Unlike linalool, myrcene did not produce a synergistic effect with cannabidiol in either sex. |
In humans, it has not been shown that myrcene alone alleviates insomnia at doses typical for inhalation of flower. The direction of the effect in rodents depends on the route of administration and sex: after intraperitoneal injection in 2002, a slightly anxiogenic effect was described, and after inhalation in 2024, an anxiolytic effect in females. These two results do not cancel each other out, they only show that the conclusion depends on conditions that no popular strain database provides. The conclusion for this strain is therefore: the description of myrcene describes myrcene, not the content of a specific bag.
What side effects have been reported from this strain?
None that could be attributed specifically to this name. Safety monitoring in Poland is conducted by the batch number of a specific medicinal product, so a single cultivar does not have its own entry in this system and its frequency of side effects cannot be calculated.
Reports of adverse effects are collected for the medicinal product with a batch number, not for the strain name, so the following concerns cannabis flower as a group of raw materials. The most commonly reported are dry mouth, red eyes, and increased heart rate. Less frequently described are dizziness upon rapid standing, daytime drowsiness, and transient worsening of short-term memory, as well as anxiety increasing with dosage. A separate issue is medications taken concurrently, especially sedatives and those affecting coagulation: their assessment requires knowledge of the entire list of preparations, not the description of the plant. We do not provide the frequency of these symptoms numerically because public compilations for cannabis flower in Poland do not separate them by individual products.
The lack of its own statistics does not mean that this position is milder than others. It only means that the report of its use falls into the common pool along with the rest of the cannabis flower, and no one extracts it from that pool.
At what temperature do the terpenes mentioned with this strain vaporize?
The range is large: pinene boils at 156.2 °C, myrcene at 166.8 °C, limonene at 177.8 °C, and caryophyllene only at 257.5 °C. For farnesene, the collection of measurements has no value. The table collects these numbers, but they describe pure substances, not flower in the vaporizer chamber.
| Terpene mentioned in descriptions | Boiling point at atmospheric pressure | Which base mentions it |
|---|---|---|
| pinene | 156.2 °C | only BudCare |
| myrcene | 166.8 °C | both |
| limonene | 177.8 °C | both |
| caryophyllene | 257.5 °C | both |
| farnesene | no measurement in the collection | only BudCare |
The boiling point describes the moment when a pure substance transitions to vapor in a laboratory vessel under atmospheric pressure. In the vaporizer chamber, conditions are different: the flower heats unevenly, some compounds evaporate below their boiling point, and the display shows the temperature of the heating element or airflow, not the material itself. Therefore, the same numbers transcribed into two guides lead to two different settings. The extreme values in the table are separated by over one hundred degrees, so no single setting will vaporize everything at once: before the chamber reaches a level sufficient for caryophyllene, lighter compounds will have long evaporated.
With this strain, there is also uncertainty about the composition itself. Since one base mentions pinene and the other omits it, the lower limit of the range is also uncertain: in a batch without pinene, the lowest boiling component remains myrcene. A vaporizer set for one compound is therefore not a precise tool, but a choice of which of the mentioned components has a chance to be in the vapor. We describe separately how to read the terpene vaporization temperature tables.
Which strains from Polish pharmacies are related to it?
None. The pedigree graph built for this set finds no siblings for Mystic Wonder among positions currently available in Polish trade, as no other described cultivar has Garlic Sherbert or Cactus Breath as parents. The empty list is a result here, not a gap to be filled.
This is not due to a lack of knowledge about the origin, as the lineage is known. It is due to the fact that both parent strains function in Polish trade solely as names in someone else’s genealogy, not as separate pharmacy positions whose descriptions could be compared with this text.
Kinship is not created by a common producer or similar aroma. Suprobion supplies two other positions to Polish pharmacies, Gorilla Glue and Humble Warrior, but they are connected by the production line, not by parents. They are worth comparing when asking about production standards, not when asking about genetics, and this is served by a separate text about the producer itself.
Caution here is intentional. A lineage added by intuition creates false connections between parties, and once a reference to alleged siblings is made, it is read as a fact. In this set, parents were not disclosed for twenty-five cultivars, so the temptation to close the graph returns in many places and ends the same way everywhere. We maintain a complete list of positions available in Polish pharmacies in the current strain list.
Frequently asked questions about Mystic Wonder
Is Mystic Wonder an indica strain or a hybrid?
It depends on the base. BudCare describes it as a hybrid with indica dominance, Medweed as a hybrid without a note. Both refer to the same registered name and the same producer, so the difference concerns classification, not the raw material.
How many producers supply Mystic Wonder to Polish pharmacies?
One, Suprobion. In the assortment list, the strain corresponds to a single position, so there are no parallel pharmacy versions to compare.
Why do we provide the content as a range and not a single number?
Because the value on the label has an allowable deviation upwards and downwards by a tenth of itself. The range 20.7-25.3% reflects the producer’s declaration along with this tolerance, and a bare number would sound like a measurement made on a specific bag.
How do we know who the parents of this strain are?
From two independent industry descriptions that provide the same pair: Garlic Sherbert and Cactus Breath. Neither is a scientific publication, so the record says that such genealogy was provided by the breeder or distributor.
Is there a pharmacokinetic study for Mystic Wonder?
No. The time ranges described in this text concern the route of administration, not this cultivar, and look the same for any other position from the pharmacy.
At what temperature does myrcene boil?
Chemical bases provide for myrcene 166.8 °C at atmospheric pressure. This is a value measured for a pure substance, not a recommendation for setting the vaporizer.
Does Mystic Wonder have siblings in Polish pharmacies?
No. No other described cultivar has Garlic Sherbert or Cactus Breath as parents, so the list of related positions remains empty.
Editorial text of the service, author: ubucha.







