Lemon Haze Gelato (Cannabis flos S-LAB): a lineage from two lines and one source of profile

Lemon Haze Gelato is available in Polish pharmacies from one manufacturer, and its terpene composition is described by only one database. We gathered what can be confirmed and separately what no one has measured.

Where does Lemon Haze Gelato come from?

From the cross of Lemon Haze with the Gelato strain. This is stated in the only material where the lineage of this strain appears at all, and it is the basis for our entire record. The breeder has not published their own description of the cross, so there is simply no second, independent confirmation of the parent names.

Both components of the name refer to a lineage with numerous offspring. Lemon Haze grows from the citrus branch of hazes, while Gelato is a family known mainly for numbered phenotypes, each of which is often described separately. The lineage record thus indicates rather two families than two specific plants, and this difference later returns when questioning sibling relationships. None of the parents can be found as a separate entry in the Polish pharmacy, so the lineage of this crossbreed cannot be traced back even one generation in our listing.

The genetics of this strain are described as a hybrid with a sativa dominance, and this description also comes from a single entry, not from analysis. In the entire compilation, the lineage has been established for sixty out of eighty-five strains, so Lemon Haze Gelato belongs to the better-documented part, although all the documentation fits here in one paragraph of someone else's text. If this source were to disappear, nothing would remain about the origin of this strain except for the name itself.

Which manufacturer has this strain in Polish pharmacies?

One: S-LAB. In the compilation we are working on, this strain corresponds to exactly one pharmacy entry, so there are no parallel versions to place side by side. Comparisons between manufacturers, which take up half the text for more popular strains, have no basis for this entry.

Producer Registered name without a numerical component Declared THC content Genetics according to the profile source Availability according to the profile source
S-LAB Cannabis flos S-LAB 16,2-19,8% hybrid with a sativa dominance described as tall

The registered name carries a number that we consciously omit. It is the same declared value, subject to a deviation of about one-tenth, so quoted alone it would sound like the result of a batch measurement. Therefore, the THC content stands separately, in the range of 16.2-19.8%, and not in the name.

The presence of one entry in the list does not mean it will be in the pharmacy tomorrow. The turnover of the raw material depends on permits, on the release of the batch by the manufacturer, and on what has just arrived at the wholesaler, which can cause the strain to disappear for several weeks and then return without warning. We keep the current status solely in one place, in the compilation of available strains, and we do not replicate it in texts about individual entries.

S-LAB accounts for thirty-eight strains in this listing, from names repeated by several manufacturers to positions like this one, which no one else has. We discuss its complete list in a separate text about this manufacturer.

What does this dried flower smell and taste like?

Citrusy and fruity, with a sweet accent and earthy background. These are the descriptions from the database, which is the only one that describes the profile of this strain. These are not results of sensory analysis or measurement, but catalog labels, so we read them as a hint about the direction of the smell, not as data.

The terpene composition comes from the same, single source and lists humulene, caryophyllene, and limonene. An interesting detail is the order: the profile base places humulene, while the catalog of pharmacy entries, from which we built the inventory, marks this strain with caryophyllene. Both lists refer to the same entry, and this alone shows how little the leading terpene label means.

We do not transcribe percentage shares because none of such compilations indicate what they refer to. Summed entries from one database give over four-fifths of the total, from another less than half, and the rest is not named by anyone. A number without a denominator looks in a text about the drug like the result of a study, but it is not.

The name of the terpene is not, in fact, a description of the strain's scent. In the extract from chemical records, on which we base our temperature data, only limonene It has a distinctly lemon scent; with humulene and caryophyllene, there are only boiling temperatures. The aroma of the dried flower arises from a mixture of several dozen compounds, not just the three names listed in the catalog.

How long does it take for this dried flower to take effect and how long does it last?

It depends on the method of administration, not the name on the jar. With vaporization, we talk about minutes; with ingestion, we talk about tens of minutes. No one has measured this specifically for Lemon Haze Gelato, so the ranges below describe the behavior of the raw material in the body, not the properties of this strain.

The route of administration determines the course more than the variety itself. After vaporization, the substance passes from the lungs to the blood almost immediately, so the first sensations appear after a few minutes, the intensity increases for another ten to thirty minutes, and the whole effect lasts for two to four hours. After ingestion, the raw material first passes through the intestine and liver, so the first sensations are awaited from half an hour to two hours, and the episode can last six, sometimes eight hours. Hence the most common mistake with oral administration: anyone who thinks nothing is happening after thirty minutes and takes another dose will receive both doses at once. The above ranges describe the route of administration, not this variety; pharmacokinetic studies for a single cultivar have not been published.

For this specific item, nothing more can be added. Neither the manufacturer nor the profile description provides any time value, and the only label regarding effects mentions stimulating action, without reference to minutes or hours. Such a description cannot yield a beginning or end of the episode.

What has been demonstrated and what has not been demonstrated in studies on this strain?

Nothing has been shown regarding the strain itself. There is no clinical or observational study conducted for Lemon Haze Gelato, and what can be honestly referenced here pertains to one terpene from its profile and comes from animal studies and cell experiments.

The Gertsch team described a result in 2008 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PMID: 18574142) that put caryophyllene in the spotlight: (E)-caryophyllene selectively bound to the CB2 receptor (Ki = 155 nM) and inhibited carrageenan-induced paw swelling in wild-type mice, but not in CB2 receptor-deficient mice (Cnr2-/-), indicating a CB2-dependent mechanism; the study did not include any anxiety tests.

Six years later, the Klauke group examined a different scenario in European Neuropsychopharmacology (PMID: 24210682). Oral caryophyllene reduced the late inflammatory phase of pain in the formalin test in a CB2 receptor-dependent manner, with no effect on the early phase; in a neuropathic pain model, it alleviated thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia without developing tolerance with chronic administration.

The boundaries of both studies must be stated clearly, as they determine what cannot be inferred from them. In neither of the two studies was caryophyllene tested on humans or in inhaled form from dried flower; both studies pertain to oral or systemic administration in mice in pain and inflammation models, not sleep or mood.

On the other side stands the catalog material: the base describing the profile assigns this strain a stimulating effect, while commercial descriptions add the rest. This is a relationship, not a measurement, and it cannot be substituted for the result of an experiment or vice versa. Therefore, the honest state of knowledge about this position is as follows: we know its declared composition, we know the work on individual components, and we know nothing about the strain itself beyond what the manufacturer has written about it. We discuss caryophyllene itself and the boundaries of the research conducted on it in a separate article.

What side effects have been reported for this strain?

None specifically attributed to it by name. There is no public compilation of events that could be related to this item, and reports circulating on forums describe the experiences of individual people, not observations conducted according to any protocol. The lack of such data must be stated clearly, rather than replaced with a narrative.

Reports of adverse effects are collected for medicinal products with a batch number, not for the strain name, so the following pertains to hemp dried flower as a group of raw materials. The most frequently reported symptoms are dry mouth, red eyes, and increased heart rate. Dizziness upon rapid standing, daytime drowsiness, and temporary worsening of short-term memory are less frequently described, as well as anxiety that increases with dosage. A separate issue is medications taken concurrently, especially sedatives and those affecting coagulation: their assessment requires knowledge of the entire list of preparations, not just the description of the plant. We do not provide the frequency of these symptoms numerically, as public compilations for hemp dried flower in Poland do not separate them by individual products.

For the reader, this leads to a simple consequence. A symptom noticed after this item cannot be related to any statistics, as there are no statistics for it, and we cannot separate the influence of the raw material from the dose, time of day, or equipment used. It is worth describing the event to a doctor or pharmacist, as only reports submitted this way reach the registry from which anything could ever be counted.

At what temperature do the terpenes of this strain evaporate?

There is no specific temperature for it. The manufacturer does not provide the vaporizer setting, and tables circulating online assign boiling points to individual terpenes measured under conditions that have little in common with the interior of the device. Numbers from such a table describe the substance in a flask, not the dried flower in the chamber.

This is evident in three compounds from the profile of this strain. For caryophyllene, the extract from the records indicates 257.5 °C at atmospheric pressure, but the same substance distills at 130 °C when the pressure drops to fourteen millimeters of mercury. Humulene has no measurements under normal pressure in this extract; it is only 99.5 °C at three millimeters. Limonene falls in the middle, around 177.8 °C.

A range of several dozen degrees for a single substance does not arise from measurement inaccuracies, but from the conditions under which it was performed, and therefore the comparisons of temperatures can contradict each other.. We also separately describe that the value ustawiona on the vaporizer does not equal the temperature of the dried flower in the chamber.

We do not derive practical recommendations from these numbers, as the choice of settings for prescription therapy belongs to the doctor, not to boiling tables. We provide them to show where the conflicting values repeated in guides come from.

Which strains from Polish pharmacies are related to it?

None. In the pedigree graph constructed for this comparison, Lemon Haze Gelato does not share a known parent with any other item available in Polish pharmacies, so its sibling list remains empty and that is how it stays. This is the result of checking eighty-five pedigrees, not a gap in data to be filled later.

The name can be misleading here. Gelato 33 is in the same listing, but its lineage leads through a completely different pair of plants, Sunset Sherbet crossed with Thin Mint GSC, and there is no established boundary connecting it to our strain. A common word in the trade name is not evidence of relatedness in either direction.

The second part looks similar. In the pedigree of Lilac Diesel, Silver Lemon Haze is listed under its own name, and we do not connect records by a fragment of text.. If we did that, there would be connections that no one would distinguish from established ones after a year, and the pedigree graph would lose its meaning.

Siblings appear in this comparison only when two entries have a common, identified parent, not a common broad family like haze. For Lemon Haze Gelato, this condition is not met for any other strain from the pharmacy, and we record it this way instead of adding relatives based on intuition.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Lemon Haze Gelato available without a prescription?

No. This dried flower belongs to the Rpw category and the pharmacist will only dispense it with a prescription issued by a doctor, and outside of pharmacies, this same raw material is not available in legal trade.

How many producers supply this strain to Polish pharmacies?

One, S-LAB. In the comparison we are working on, there is exactly one pharmacy entry corresponding to it, so there are no parallel versions side by side.

Why do you provide THC content as a range?

Because the value from the product card has an allowable deviation of about one-tenth, and a single number would imply a precision that is not present in this record. For this entry, the range is from 16.2 to 19.8 percent.

Is the terpene profile of this strain certain?

It is described by one source and lists humulene, caryophyllene, and limonene. We did not find a second, independent list for this entry, so we provide the composition along with information on its source.

Have clinical studies been conducted on Lemon Haze Gelato?

No, they have not been conducted. The studies that can be referenced here concern a single terpene given to mice and studied on cells, not humans taking this dried flower.

Does this strain have siblings in Polish pharmacies?

No, it does not. No other entry from this comparison shares an established parent with it, and the similarity of names to strains with the Gelato or Lemon component does not determine anything.

Hemp dried flower is a pharmaceutical raw material dispensed by a doctor's prescription in the Rpw category. The material is informational in nature and does not replace a conversation with the doctor conducting the therapy. We update the current availability of strains in the comparison of medical marijuana strains. Dried flower from industrial hemp, dispensed without a prescription, is a different raw material and falls under the category dried hemp.

Editorial text by the team u Bucha.

Trust
Find out more about us
Free shipping
From 49 PLN - parcel locker
Easy contact
Have any questions? Contact us.
Loyalty
The only program of its kind - collect the boogie

Don't go…

I have something for you:

We did it!

Rabat dodany - zobaczysz go w kasie :)

There has been a problem

Unfortunately this discount cannot be applied to your cart.

This site is for adults only.

Are you over 18 years old?

Book with you