Cannabis Strains

Two strains from the same trio of producers and with the same recorded THC content range. They are separated by the leading terpene and lineage, and Polish strain databases do not agree on the composition of either.

The same trio of producers and the same declared content range, but a different leading terpene in the profile and a different state of knowledge about lineage: for one of these strains, the parents are named, while for the other, no available source establishes them.

The pair is separated by lineage and list of producers, but connected by the same leading terpene. The comparison shows what can be inferred from the registry data of both strains and what cannot be read from them.

Gorilla Glue leads with caryophyllene, Cataract Kush with myrcene, and the difference goes further: the profile of the first is described by two inconsistent sources, while the profile of the second by one. The comparison also shows where such wide content ranges come from.

Both strains are led by the same terpene, but one has parents described in the source, while the other has no established origin, and no producer supplies both at once. A comparison of profiles, declared ranges, and the state of evidence.

Two strains from the same three producers and with the same THC range, which diverge on the leading terpene and lineage. Neither of the two terpene profiles is confirmed, but for completely different reasons.

Two strains from the same three producers, with an identical declared THC content range and a completely different scent profile. A comparison of what is known about both and what has not been demonstrated.

Both strains reach Polish pharmacies in the entries of the same three producers and fall within the same range of declarations, yet they are divided by the leading terpene and whether anything can be said about their origin.

Two strains from Polish pharmacies share six names of terpenes, but differ in the leading terpene, origin, and list of producers. What do the sources say about them, and what does none say.

The same registered name, the same three producers, and the same THC content range. The only difference between these strains lies in the position of nerolidol in the profile table and the fact that the lineage is documented only on one side.